Recently I came across an article by Shek
& Wong (2011) which discussed the need for holistic development in university
students. There are three things that
caught my attention when I reflect on my experiences. They are (1) Impact of depression on suicidal
ideations, (2) the high similarities of characteristics between US and HK
college students and (3) the need for university involvement.
Impact of depression on suicidal ideations
The authors reported that besides
psychosocial stressors (e.g. examinations and financial stresses), mental
health is a growing concern among university students. Depression is the leading instigator to a
variety of negative outcomes contributing to the bulk of suicides on college
campuses. A web-based survey of 2,843
Midwestern undergraduates found a prevalence rate of 15.6% for depressive or
anxiety disorder. Suicide is the second
leading cause of death among college students in the US after homicides and
accidents. According to the Big Ten
College Study, the death rate of suicide among college students is at an
astonishing high rate of 7.5/100,000! This
data indeed supported the research I mentioned in my post dated 13 Dec about
the mediation effect of depression to academic stress and suicidal
ideations. Whilst I do not have the Hong
Kong statistics, the university which I am acquainted with does have a high
suicidal rate, and I understand all of them had prior history of depression or
anxiety.
The “dark side” of college students” (Shek
& Wong, 2011)
I am truly amazed to find out what was
described as the dark side for US students can be found in my HK students
through the self-reflections logs they handed in as their assignments. The Me Generations are not empathetic with
rising narcissistic personalities especially in business students. They are more self-interested than
team-oriented. In addition, many
students are often not prepared to be young adults with all the
responsibilities. Moreover, there is a significant
shift in college students’ values to a more self-focused and financially
oriented philosophy, which is in line with a decrease in social responsibility and
civic participation. It was reported
that the top two students’ goals were to be financially well-off (78.1) and
raising a family (74.7%).
What does this
mean? I believe the focus on extrinsic
needs adds onto the stress and anxiety that an undergraduate face, especially
so for Asian societies like HK which tends to evaluate a person’s success measured
by career achievements and how much people earn. This is worsened by the fact, as reported in
the article that these students are not prepared to take on responsibilities. I feel the level of anxiety or stress
tolerance is lower than that of the Gen X (I know because I am one of
them). What causes this? My educated guess is that these students used
to enjoy parents’ warmth and protectiveness up to their high school years; but
when they are at the university, they are derived from such parental type of
warmth and protectiveness, coupled with their lack of willingness or capability
to take on responsibilities as a young adult, they become stressed, feel high
level of anxiety and even depressed. A
research mentioned in my previous post proposed that parenting warmth and
protectiveness decreases level of depression.
Does it mean university educators need to take on the role of parenting
to provide such warmth and protectiveness?
How should universities respond?
This is what I will discuss in my next post.
Reference
Shek, D.T.L and Wong, K.K. (2011). Do adolescent developmental issues disappear
overnight? Reflections about holistic
development in university students. The ScientificWorld Journal, 11, 353-361.
Doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.5